The Tug-of-War in Tokenomics

Tokenomics have alway been a critical factor in the success or failure of projects. The design and valuation models of tokens can significantly influence market dynamics, investor behavior, and the long-term viability of a project. This article explores the pros and cons of various token design strategies, including lockup periods, low float, and their impact on price discovery, with a focus on the ongoing battle between venture capital and public markets.

The Tug-of-War: VC vs. Public Markets

1. Lockup Periods

Pros:

• Incentive Alignment: Lockups can help align incentives between the project team, early investors, and the broader community. By ensuring that tokens are not immediately available for sale, the team demonstrates a commitment to the project's long-term success.
• Market Stability: Lockups can prevent large sell-offs immediately after the token generation event (TGE), which can stabilize the price and prevent

Cons:

• Delayed Price Discovery: Lockup periods can distort price discovery, especially in the early stages of a project. With a significant portion of tokens locked up, the available supply is artificially restricted, leading to potentially inflated prices that do not accurately reflect the project's underlying value.
• Investor Frustration: Retail investors and the public market may view long lockup periods as a red flag, signaling that the project is trying to prevent early investors from exiting. This can create distrust and reduce market enthusiasm.

Lockup periods are a double-edged sword. While they can align incentives and stabilize prices, they also risk distorting true price discovery and alienating retail investors. The key is to find a balance that incentivizes long-term commitment without stifling market liquidity.

2. Low Float

Pros:

• Potential for High Returns: A low float can create a scarcity effect, driving up demand and, consequently, the token price. In a bull market, low-float tokens can experience significant price increases as demand outstrips supply.
• Strategic Price Control: Projects can use a low float to control the initial market valuation, ensuring that early investors and the team can achieve higher returns if the project gains traction.

Cons:

• Price Volatility: Low float often leads to increased volatility. With a limited number of tokens in circulation, even small trades can significantly impact the price, making the token more susceptible to market manipulation and speculative trading.
• Lack of True Market Sentiment: Low float can also obscure genuine market sentiment. With only a small percentage of tokens in circulation, the market price might not reflect the broader community's perception or the project's long-term value.

While low float can create short-term opportunities for significant gains, it comes with increased risks of volatility and price manipulation. Projects should consider the trade-offs carefully and ensure that the low float strategy aligns with their long-term goals.

3. Price Discovery

Pros:

• Efficient Markets: Proper price discovery mechanisms ensure that the token's value reflects the project's true potential and market sentiment. This helps attract serious investors and builds long-term trust in the project.
• Transparency: Effective price discovery processes, such as transparent token sales and fair distribution models, can enhance the project's credibility and attract a wider range of investors.

Cons:

• Challenging in Early Stages: Achieving accurate price discovery in the early stages of a project can be difficult, especially if the project employs low float or long lockups. This can lead to initial overvaluation or undervaluation, which may be corrected later, often to the detriment of early investors.
• VC vs. Public Market Dynamics: The dynamics between venture capital and public markets can further complicate price discovery. VCs typically prefer long lockups to ensure their investment matures, while public markets often demand immediate liquidity. This tension can lead to mismatches in token valuation and market expectations.

Price discovery is crucial for the healthy development of any tokenized project. However, achieving it is challenging, especially when balancing the interests of VCs and public markets. Transparent and well-thought-out distribution strategies are essential to align these interests and ensure accurate price discovery.

4. The Current Market Environment: Launchpads and FDV

In the current market, we observe launchpads aiming for fully diluted valuations (FDVs) in the range of $5 million to $20 million. This conservative approach reflects the lack of public interest in new projects, driven by several factors:

• Bearish Sentiment: The broader crypto market has seen a decline in speculative interest, leading to more cautious valuations and smaller initial raises.
• Risk Aversion: Investors are increasingly wary of high FDV projects with low floats, as these can be susceptible to manipulation and do not offer a clear picture of the project's value.
• Focus on Utility: There is a growing preference for projects with clear utility and real-world applications, as opposed to purely speculative tokens. This shift in investor focus is driving down FDV expectations and making it harder for new projects to achieve high valuations.

The trend towards lower FDVs in launchpads highlights the current market's cautious sentiment. It also underscores the importance of strong tokenomics and clear value propositions for new projects looking to attract public interest.

Final Thoughts Navigating Token Design

The design of a token and its associated valuation models are critical to the success of any blockchain project. As we have explored, lockups, low float, and price discovery each have their pros and cons, and the optimal approach depends on the project's specific goals and the current market environment.

In the ongoing battle between VC-backed and public markets, projects must strike a balance that accommodates both liquidity needs and long-term value creation. By carefully considering these factors and designing tokenomics that align with market expectations, projects can improve their chances of success in an increasingly competitive and sophisticated crypto landscape.

‍